Newfoundland and Labrador government suit

 

April 12, 2000

Newfoundland government announces it will proceed with legislation to allow the province to sue tobacco companies for damages related to health care costs.

April 11, 12, 2001

Newfoundland Justice Minister introduces the Tobacco Health Care Costs Recovery Act, and appoints a Select Committee of the House of Assembly to hold hearings into the act. 

May 2001

Newfoundland House of Assembly holds hearings and debates Tobacco Health Care Costs Recovery Act.

 

May 24, 2001

Newfoundland's "Tobacco Health Care Costs Recovery Act" is passed.

October, 2002

Newfoundland engages U.S. lawfirm Humphrey, Farrington, McClain and Edgar to manage the case on a 30% contingency fee.  (see media coverage below)

February 8, 2011

Newfoundland and Labrador proclaim Tobacco Health Care Costs REcovery Act and file suit against the tobacco companies

 

 

 

------------------

Media:

Newfoundland ready to take on tobacco giants;

October 19, 2002

The government of Newfoundland and Labrador has hired a U.S. law firm in anticipation of a court fight with the tobacco industry over who should pay for health costs related to smoking.

"This lawsuit is not just about recouping the province's costs," Premier Roger Grimes said yesterday. "It is about making tobacco companies accountable . . . (and) we are hoping that through this lawsuit we can change the attitude of people in this province, of all ages, towards tobacco use."

The law firm Humphrey, Farrington, McClain and Edgar of Independence, Mo., has confirmed it will take on the province's case through a contingency fee arrangement. The firm will be paid a 30 per cent share of any settlement or court award.

In November 1998, the firm was involved in a landmark case that resulted in tobacco companies agreeing to pay $206 billion US in tobacco-related claims to eight U.S. states.
U.S. attorney Ken McClain, who will be working on the case, made a name for himself in 1997 when his client, Janet Sackman, won a settlement in New York after she sued a tobacco company.

The settlement marked the first time a tobacco company agreed to pay for damages caused by smoking directly to a plaintiff.

Manitoba, Quebec and New Brunswick have also shown interest in filing lawsuits against tobacco companies.

Newfoundland's Liberal government has largely followed the lead of B.C. In 1998, that province became the first jurisdiction in Canada to seek a legal means of recovering smoking-related health costs from tobacco companies.

To do that, it passed the Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act, which allowed the B.C. government to sue Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson and Hedges Inc. and JTI-Macdonald Inc.

But in February 2000, the Supreme Court of British Columbia struck down the legislation, saying it went too far in trying to implicate the multinational parents of Canadian subsidiaries operating in British Columbia.

The act was redrafted and another lawsuit was filed in January 2001. A Nov. 4 trial and hearing will determine the constitutional validity of the act and to deal with jurisdictional challenges filed by the foreign owners of the tobacco companies.

Newfoundland introduced legislation similar to B.C.'s in May 2001 and the province is now bracing for legal challenges from the tobacco companies.

Canadian Press

N.L. seeks to recover health care costs; launches suit against tobacco companies; N.L. launches suit against tobacco companies

ST. JOHN'S, N.L. - The government of Newfoundland and Labrador has filed a lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers to recover the costs of treating smoking-related illnesses, 10 years after it introduced legislation allowing it to sue tobacco companies.

"By proclaiming this piece of legislation we want to expose tobacco companies for misrepresenting the harm associated with their products," Justice Minister Felix Collins said in a news release.

The Tobacco Health Care Costs Recovery Act was passed by the House of Assembly in 2001 but only proclaimed on Tuesday.

"We now have entrenched in our provincial statutes the mechanisms by which we can attempt to recover the health-related costs associated with tobacco use," Collins said.
The province says its 51-page statement of claim names more than a dozen manufacturers including industry giants Rothmans Inc. and Philip Morris USA Inc.

The province has been monitoring other jurisdictions with similar legislation and now feels it has everything necessary to build a strong case, said Collins.

The court action seeks recovery of costs associated with health-care services provided to individuals who have suffered from tobacco-related diseases, as well as future health-related costs to the province.

"Tobacco use costs the province several hundred million dollars annually in both direct health care costs and indirect costs including productivity lost due to illness and premature death," Health Minister Jerome Kennedy said in the release.

He said tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable disease and death and is attributable to lung cancer, heart disease and respiratory disease.

The government has hired a law firm in St. John's to handle the case.The Newfoundland team will get legal advice from a law firm that specializes in tobacco litigation based in Independence, Mo.

The Canadian Press

 



PSC - HOME

 

Litigation sub-site home

 


Timeline of tobacco litigation 

 

Canada

 

 


Class Actions - current

Blais & Letourneau

Knight

 


Class Action - historic

Caputo

Ragoonanan

Gagnon

Sparkes

 


Private litigation - current

Spasaic

Stright


Private litigation - historic

Battaglia

Chalut

McIntyre

Perron

Rowlands


Government Litigation-current and historic

British Columbia

Canada

New Brunswick

Newfoundland

 

Ontario

Quebec

Criminal